Journal of Thai Protestant Theology

Volume 2, Issue 1 – May 2025

Has Prophecy Ceased? A Biblical and Theological Defense of the Cessation of Revelatory Foretelling

Author: Dr. Chansamone Saiyasak (Professor of Religious Studies and Missiology), Theological Commissions of Evangelical Fellowship of Thailand & Asia Evangelical Alliance (a WEA-Regional Alliance) | Author’s Profile

Date: 4 May 2025

Abstract: This paper explores the biblical and theological rationale for the cessation of the prophetic gift of foretelling in the post-apostolic church age. It argues that while foretelling—defined as divinely revealed, authoritative communication—has ceased with the closing of the biblical canon, the Spirit-empowered forthtelling of God’s Word continues. Key scriptural passages such as Ephesians 2:20, Hebrews 1:1–2, and 1 Corinthians 13:8–10 are examined to support the cessationist view. The paper distinguishes between prophecy as new revelation and the Spirit’s ongoing work in guiding, convicting, and empowering the church today. It also reflects on the sufficiency of Scripture, historical affirmations of cessationism, and the continuing relevance of the Spirit’s ministry through illumination, impressions, and bold proclamation. This balanced position upholds both the authority of Scripture and the vitality of the Holy Spirit’s ongoing work in the church.

Introduction

Among Evangelical Protestants, the question of whether prophecy continues today raises theological concerns regarding authority, revelation, and the Spirit’s activity. A key distinction must be made between prophecy as “foretelling”—that is, the reception of new, divinely revealed truth—and prophecy as “forthtelling,” the bold and Spirit-guided proclamation of truths already revealed in Scripture.

This paper affirms the cessation of foretelling prophecy, while strongly upholding the ongoing, vital ministry of the Holy Spirit in empowering forthtelling, guiding the church through illumination, impressions, and spiritual discernment—all under the authority of the completed Word of God. The argument presented is that the revelatory function of prophecy has ceased with the close of the biblical canon, while the Spirit’s unction in proclamation, prayer, conviction, and sanctification continues with full power and relevance today.

This paper explores the biblical and theological rationale for the cessation of the prophetic gift of foretelling in the post-apostolic church age. It argues that while foretelling—defined as divinely revealed, authoritative communication—has ceased with the closing of the biblical canon, the Spirit-empowered forthtelling of God’s Word continues. Key scriptural passages such as Ephesians 2:20, Hebrews 1:1–2, and 1 Corinthians 13:8–10 are examined to support the cessationist view. The paper distinguishes between prophecy as new revelation and the Spirit’s ongoing work in guiding, convicting, and empowering the church today. It also reflects on the sufficiency of Scripture, historical affirmations of cessationism, and the continuing relevance of the Spirit’s ministry through illumination, impressions, and bold proclamation. This balanced position upholds both the authority of Scripture and the vitality of the Holy Spirit’s ongoing work in the church.

Among Evangelical Protestants, the question of whether prophecy continues today raises theological concerns regarding authority, revelation, and the Spirit’s activity. A key distinction must be made between prophecy as “foretelling”—that is, the reception of new, divinely revealed truth—and prophecy as “forthtelling,” the bold and Spirit-guided proclamation of truths already revealed in Scripture. This paper affirms the cessation of foretelling prophecy, while strongly upholding the ongoing, vital ministry of the Holy Spirit in empowering forthtelling, guiding the church through illumination, impressions, and spiritual discernment—all under the authority of the completed Word of God.

Biblical prophecy takes two major forms. First is foretelling—receiving and declaring new revelation directly from God, often including predictions of future events or authoritative guidance for the church. This type of prophecy is revelatory in nature and foundational in function. Second is forthtelling, which refers to speaking forth God’s already revealed Word, applying it powerfully and timely to people’s hearts and contexts. Evangelicals who affirm cessationism do not deny prophecy in all forms, but only prophecy as normative, infallible divine revelation. Spirit-empowered proclamation (forthtelling) continues through pastors, teachers, and believers who faithfully interpret and apply Scripture. The Holy Spirit still speaks—not by giving new revelation, but by bringing to mind Scripture, impressing truths, and guiding the church providentially (Vanhoozer, 2005; Grudem, 1994).

Biblical and Theological Foundations for the Cessation of Prophecy

Paul writes in Ephesians 2:20 that the church is “built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets.” The role of prophets in the early church was revelatory and foundational. Like the apostles, their function was not ongoing but historically unique—part of the foundation, not the building superstructure (Reymond, 1998). The office of prophet cannot be replicated after the apostolic era without undermining the sufficiency and finality of Scripture.

Hebrews 1:1–2 declares that “in the past God spoke to our ancestors through the prophets… but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son.” This verse confirms the completeness and superiority of God’s final revelation in Christ, recorded by apostolic witnesses. Any claim to ongoing prophetic revelation risks adding to this final Word, contradicting the sufficiency of the canon (MacArthur, 2013). The prophetic witness of the New Testament, like that of the Old, pointed forward to Christ. Once He came and the New Testament was written, the revelatory function of prophecy reached its culmination.

1 Corinthians 13:8–10 further suggests that prophecy and knowledge (in their partial, revelatory form) “will pass away… when the perfect comes.” While some interpret “the perfect” as Christ’s second coming, others understand it as the full maturity of the church with the completed canon. Either view supports the temporary nature of revelatory gifts (Carson, 1987). They were never intended to be permanent features of church life, but provisional aids during the foundational era.

The cessation of foretelling prophecy, however, does not imply the end of the Spirit’s presence, power, or guidance. On the contrary, the Holy Spirit continues to minister in the church—convicting hearts (John 16:8), illuminating Scripture (1 Cor. 2:12–14), empowering mission (Acts 1:8), and prompting believers in personal and communal life. What has ceased is not the Spirit, but the reception of new, authoritative revelation outside Scripture (Calvin, 2008).

Forthtelling and the Spirit’s Ongoing Ministry

The sufficiency of Scripture is a cornerstone of evangelical theology. Paul affirms in 2 Timothy 3:16–17 that all Scripture is “God-breathed” and “thoroughly equips” the man of God “for every good work.” The claim that modern prophecy is still needed for the edification or direction of the church risks undermining the completeness of the biblical witness (Strange, 2015). While God may guide His people through providence, wisdom, and Spirit-formed impressions, such guidance must never compete with or supplement the canon.

Forthtelling—the Spirit-empowered proclamation and application of Scripture—remains vital. Pastors, evangelists, and believers proclaim the gospel with clarity and conviction because the Spirit is at work through the Word (1 Thess. 1:5). Sermons may powerfully “reveal the secrets of the heart” (1 Cor. 14:24–25), not because the preacher receives revelation, but because God applies His Word with precision to listeners’ lives.

The Spirit’s unction—His anointing presence and empowering work—continues today in the life of every believer. This unction does not bring new revelation but enables bold proclamation, spiritual discernment, and holy living. The Holy Spirit empowers forthtelling, not foretelling—strengthening the church through the faithful application of Scripture (1 Thess. 1:5). He continues to guide and prompt believers, but always in a non-authoritative way that must be tested by Scripture (1 John 4:1; Rom. 8:14). The Spirit produces spiritual transformation and fuels gospel mission, not through charismatic displays of power, but through the fruit of the Spirit and Word-centered ministry (Gal. 5:22–23; Acts 1:8). This understanding safeguards the sufficiency of Scripture while affirming the vitality of the Spirit’s work today.

Sufficiency of Scripture and the Closure of the Canon

Throughout church history, key theologians have affirmed the cessation of apostolic and prophetic gifts. John Calvin asserted that the miraculous gifts “ceased long ago,” and that God no longer chooses to reveal Himself in the same way because His truth is fully declared in Scripture (Calvin, 2008). The Reformers rejected any claim to new revelation, recognizing that Scripture alone is the authoritative Word of God. This stance was a crucial bulwark against medieval mysticism and Roman Catholic claims of extra-biblical authority.

In modern contexts, many Christians—especially in areas with limited gospel access—report dreams, visions, or impressions that lead them to seek Christ. Cessationists do not deny that God can providentially use such experiences. However, these are not understood as revelations, but as preparatory means by which God draws people to Himself (González, 2010). Like Cornelius in Acts 10, those who receive such impressions must ultimately hear and believe the gospel message through Scripture and the church’s witness (Rom. 10:14–17).

In young or unreached church contexts, some argue that spiritual gifts like prophecy are still “needed” for guidance and edification. But biblically, “need” does not determine what is normative. The gifts of prophecy were signs accompanying the apostolic foundation (Heb. 2:3–4). Once the foundation was laid, the normative means of guidance shifted to Scripture, the church, and the Spirit’s sanctifying work (Reymond, 1998). God still works powerfully today, but in a way consistent with the authority of His Word.

The Supernatural and Miraculous in a Post-Canonical Age: Healings and Life Transformations

A common question raised against cessationism is how to explain current reports of healing, deliverance, and supernatural life transformation if the revelatory gifts have ceased. A balanced cessationist view does not deny the miraculous. Rather, it distinguishes between acts of divine providence and mercy and the distribution of sign gifts for revelation and apostolic validation.

The New Testament gift of healing (1 Cor. 12:9) referred to a Spirit-endowed ability distributed to specific individuals for repeated and public healing miracles. These were signs validating apostolic ministry and confirming the gospel in the church’s foundational stage (Heb. 2:3–4). In contrast, present-day healing is understood as an act of divine compassion in response to prayer (James 5:14–16), not a permanent gift possessed by individuals.

The greatest ongoing miracle is the regeneration of hearts. When sinners are made alive in Christ, the Spirit grants them new life (Ezek. 36:26–27), delivers them from sin’s dominion (Rom. 6:18), and produces Christlike character (Gal. 5:22–23). These transformations are no less supernatural than physical miracles, and they demonstrate the Spirit’s power at work through the ordinary means of grace—Scripture, prayer, fellowship, and the gospel.

Miraculous Works, Healing, and Spiritual Transformation Today

Reports of dramatic healing or deliverance must be tested against Scripture. Are they Christ-exalting, doctrinally sound, and oriented toward gospel proclamation? Or do they elevate individual personalities or distract from the Word? The Holy Spirit never contradicts Himself—He will not lead believers away from the Scriptures He inspired (2 Tim. 3:16–17), nor will He act in ways inconsistent with the gospel.

Thus, a cessationist framework fully affirms that God still heals and transforms today. What it rejects is the continuation of the gift of healing or prophecy as distributed, authoritative, Spirit-empowered functions. Today’s miracles are not signs of apostleship or channels of revelation, but testimonies to God’s mercy that support the church’s mission.

Evaluating Continuationist Redefinitions of Prophecy

Proponents of Continuationism—such as David Lim, Wayne Grudem, Sam Storms, and Dennis Lum—offer redefinitions of New Testament prophecy in an attempt to retain the gift within the post-apostolic church. David Lim distinguishes prophecy from preaching by describing it as a spontaneous message from the Holy Spirit revealing secrets unknown to man. Grudem (1994) defines prophecy as “speaking merely human words to report something God brings to mind.” Similarly, Sam Storms describes it as “a human report of a divine revelation,” while Dennis Lum emphasizes its spontaneous and Spirit-initiated nature, distinct from scriptural authority.

These redefinitions aim to protect the uniqueness of Scripture by claiming that modern prophecy is fallible and non-binding. However, this approach introduces several theological and practical problems.

First, Scripture does not describe prophecy as fallible or errant. In both Old and New Testaments, prophecy was expected to be accurate and authoritative. Agabus’s predictions (Acts 11:28; 21:10–11), the Antioch prophets (Acts 13:1–2), and even the inspired visions of John in Revelation were considered binding and divinely sourced. Deuteronomy 18 places severe penalties on false prophecy, and 1 John 4 calls for rigorous testing—not mere tolerance—of those claiming divine speech.

Second, claiming that a revelation may be mixed with human error undermines the very notion of divine communication. If the Holy Spirit reveals something, it cannot simultaneously be unreliable. Grudem’s attempt to redefine NT prophecy as qualitatively different from OT prophecy lacks consistent biblical warrant and poses significant pastoral risks.

Third, redefining prophecy in this way undermines the sufficiency of Scripture. If Christians must seek “personal words from God” to know His will or receive encouragement, Scripture is rendered functionally incomplete. Continuationism unintentionally displaces the role of God’s written Word with subjective impressions.

Fourth, the illumination of the Spirit already meets the needs these redefinitions try to address. Through faithful preaching and Spirit-led discipleship, God exposes sin, comforts the weary, and equips His people (1 Cor. 14:24–25; 2 Tim. 3:16–17). There is no need to import a secondary, fallible, spontaneous prophecy when the Spirit continues to apply Scripture powerfully.

Finally, NT prophets were part of the foundational structure of the early church (Eph. 2:20). Their role was historically situated alongside the apostles. Once their role was fulfilled and the canon closed, the office ceased. The contemporary church does not need new revelation—it needs faithful interpretation and bold proclamation of what God has already revealed.

Revelatory prophecy (foretelling) has ceased, having fulfilled its unique and foundational role in redemptive history. The canon of Scripture is complete, and the office and gift of prophetic revelation—once essential for grounding the church’s doctrine and life—are no longer operative. However, forthtelling—the Spirit-empowered proclamation and application of God’s revealed Word—continues with full vigor.

Conclusion: The Spirit Still Speaks—Through the Word

The Holy Spirit remains actively at work in guiding, sanctifying, and empowering the church. He brings conviction of sin, illuminates the truths of Scripture, and prompts believers toward gospel-driven obedience and mission. Miraculous healings, spiritual impressions, and providential guidance may still occur, but these are acts of divine mercy within providence, not signs of ongoing revelatory gifts.

Cessationism does not silence the Spirit—it submits to His supreme and sufficient voice in Scripture. This view guards against spiritual manipulation, theological confusion, and experiential excess, while also embracing the power and presence of the Spirit in all of life. The church today does not need new revelation—it needs renewed dependence on the Word already spoken and the Spirit who brings it to life.

References

💬 Join the discussion: Comment on Facebook